For anyone who has never had a loved one incarcerated, the phrase “file a grievance” might sound reasonable. After all, grievances are supposed to exist to resolve problems fairly, investigate concerns, and hold institutions accountable.
But for many inmates and their families, filing a grievance feels less like a solution and more like a way to push problems aside.
When something goes missing in prison, when property is lost or stolen, or when an inmate raises concerns about unfair treatment or institutional failures, the standard response is often the same: “File a grievance.” On paper, this sounds like due process. In reality, it can feel like entering a frustrating cycle of delays, denials, and dead ends.
I know this because I have experienced it firsthand.
A television was sent through PenPack, and the warehouse confirmed that it had been received. Yet somehow, the institution had no record of it. Around the same time, several personal items had also arrived, and instead of properly investigating the issue, the institution appeared to simply connect those items to the same tracking number and move on.
As a family member trying to help from the outside, I made calls to the institution looking of answers. But there are none. I was told that my loved one had to speak with is caseworker or someone inside the institution to resolve the issue.
He followed every step required.
He asked for help. He raised the concern internally. He was told they would look into it.
Nothing happened.
Eventually, he was told to file a grievance. So he did. The expectation was simple: at minimum, there would be a proper investigation, Instead, the grievance was denied.
Now, after exhausting internal process, he is being told to take the matter to a Federal Court.
Federal Court!
Think about that for a moment. Families of incarcerated individuals are already carrying enormous burdens. Many are managing children, finances, transportation, emotional stress, and the stigma that often comes with having an incarcerated loved one. They are expected to keep household running while also providing emotional and financial support to someone behind bars.
And yet, when legitimate concerns arise, families and inmates are often met with bureaucracy instead of solutions.
What makes situations like this even more frustrating is the imbalance of power. An inmate has limited access to resources, limited communication, and very little control over their environment. When something goes wrong, they rely on institutional staff to investigate fairly. But what happens when the system investigating itself decides there is no problem?
How does accountability exist in that space?
Grievance systems are supposed to protect fairness and transparency. They should not feel like a formality designed to discourage people from continuing to ask questions. If claims are denied without thorough investigations, or if families are left feeling unheard then the system is not functioning the way it was intended to.
This is not just about a missing television.
It is about trust.
It is about accountability.
And it is about recognizing that incarceration affects entire families, not just the person serving the sentence.
Families should not have to fight endlessly just to have concerns taken seriously. A system that asks people to trust it must also be willing to listen, investigate, and respond fairly.
Because “file a grievance” should not mean “prepare to be ignored.”
DD
Leave a comment